Research
Interests
Software
Engineering, Programming Languages, Software Verification,
Formal Methods, Security (with an emphasis on
concurrency)
Resume
[PDF]
My
Papers
Azadeh Farzan,
P. Madhusudan:
Causal Dataflow Analysis for Concurrent
Programs.
To appear in proceedings of Tools and Algorithms for the
Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS)
2007.
[PDF]
We
define a novel formulation of dataflow analysis for
concurrent programs,
where the flow of facts is along the
causal
dependencies of events.
We capture the control flow of concurrent programs using a
Petri net
(called the
control net),
develop algorithms based on partially-ordered
unfoldings, and report experimental results for solving
causal dataflow analysis problems.
For the subclass of distributive problems,
we prove that complexity of checking data flow is linear in
the number of facts
and in the
unfolding
of the control net.
Azadeh
Farzan,
P. Madhusudan:
Causal Dataflow Analysis for Concurrent
Programs.
Technical Report UIUCDCS-R-2007-2806, Computer Science
Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
2007 (full version).
[PDF]
We
define a novel formulation of dataflow analysis for
concurrent programs,
where the flow of facts is along the
causal
dependencies of events.
We capture the control flow of concurrent programs using a
Petri net
(called the
control net),
develop algorithms based on partially-ordered
unfoldings, and report experimental results for solving
causal dataflow analysis problems.
For the subclass of distributive problems,
we prove that complexity of checking data flow is linear in
the number of facts
and in the
unfolding
of the control net.
Azadeh Farzan,
José Meseguer:
State Space Reduction of Rewrite Theories Using Invisible
Transitions.
In proceedings of Algebraic Methodology and Software
Technology (AMAST) 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
volume 4019: 142--157.
[PDF]
State
space explosion is the hardest challenge to the effective
application of model checking methods. We present a new
technique for achieving drastic state space reductions that
can be applied to a very wide range of concurrent systems,
namely any system specifiable as a rewrite theory. Given a
rewrite theory R = (Σ, E, R) whose equational part
(Σ, E) specifies some state predicates P, we identify a
subset S
⊆
R of rewrite rules that are P-invisible, so that rewriting
with S does not change the truth value of the predicates P.
We then use S to construct a reduced rewrite theory
R/S in which all states reachable by S-transitions
become identified. We show that if R/S satisfies
reasonable executability assumptions, then it is in fact
stuttering bisimilar to R and therefore both satisfy
the same ACTL*-X formulas. We can
then use the typically much smaller R/S to verify
such formulas. We show through several case studies that
the reductions achievable this way can be huge in practice.
Furthermore, we also present a generalization of our
construction that instead uses a stuttering simulation and
can be applied to an even broader class of systems.
Azadeh
Farzan,
P. Madhusudan:
Causal Atomicity.
In Proceedings of Computer Aided Verification (CAV) 2006,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 4144:
315--328.
[PDF]
Atomicity
is an important generic specification that many correct
concurrent programs adhere to. Intuitively, atomicity of a
program block assures the programmer can pretend that the
block occurs sequentially in any execution. Our main
contribution is a notion of atomicity based on causality.
We model the control flow of a program with threads using a
Petri net that naturally captures the independence of
threads, the interactions between them, and the abstraction
of data. The partially ordered executions of the Petri net
are then endowed with a causality relation between events;
we exploit this to define our notion of causal atomicity.
We show that causal atomicity is a robust notion that many
programs follow, and show how we can effectively check
causal atomicity using Petri net tools based on unfoldings,
which exploit the concurrency in the net to yield automatic
partial-order reduction in the state-space.
Azadeh
Farzan,
José Meseguer:
Partial Order Reduction for Rewriting Semantics of
Programming Languages.
In proceedings of WRLA 2006: 56-75.
[PDF]
Partial
order reduction (POR) capabilities are typically added by
extending a model checking algorithm supporting analysis of
programs in a given programming language. In this paper we
propose a generic method to generate a model checker with
POR capabilities for any programming language of interest.
The method is based on giving a formal executable
specification of the semantics of a programming language L
as a rewrite theory RL
, and then exploiting the efficient execution, search, and
LTL model checking capabilities of the Maude rewriting
logic language to generate a model checker for L
essentially for free. The key idea is to achieve the
desired POR reduction by means of a theory transformation
that transforms the theory RL
into a semantically equivalent theory which is then used to
explore the POR-reduced state space. This can be done for a
language L with relatively little effort (a few man-weeks
in total, including defining the language semantics, for a
language like Java) and has the advantage of not requiring
any changes in the underlying model checker. Our
experiments with the JVM and with a Promela-like language
indicate that significant state space reductions and time
speedups can be gained for the tools generated this
way.
Azadeh
Farzan,
Feng Chen,
José Meseguer,
Grigore Rosu:
JavaFAN: A Rewriting Logic Approach to Formal Analysis of
Multithreaded Java Programs.
Technical Report UIUCDCS-R-2005-1523, Computer Science
Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
2005.
[PDF]
JavaFAN
(Java Formal ANalysis) is a multithreaded program analysis
framework based on rewriting logic specifications of Java.
It can perform several types of analysis, including
symbolic execution of Java programs, detection of safety
violations searching through the potentially unbounded
state space of a multithreaded program, and explicit state
model checking of programs whose state space is finite.
Both Java source-code and byte-code analyses are possible.
The former is user-friendly, with counter-examples directly
related to familiar Java source-code, and the latter
affords a more precise analysis of the running code, not
depending on the correctness of the compiler, and can be
used even when the Java source-code of the program is not
available.
Azadeh
Farzan,
Feng Chen,
José Meseguer,
Grigore Rosu:
Formal Analysis of Java Programs in
JavaFAN.
In proceedings of Computer Aided Verification (CAV) 2004,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3114:
501--505.
[PDF]
JavaFAN
uses a Maude rewriting logic specification of the JVM
semantics as the basis of a software analysis tool with
competitive performance. It supports formal analysis of
concurrent JVM programs by means of symbolic simulation,
breadth-first search, and LTL model checking. We discuss
JavaFAN’s executable formal specification of the JVM,
illustrate its formal analysis capabilities using several
case studies, and compare its performance with similar Java
analysis tools.
Azadeh
Farzan,
José Meseguer,
Grigore Rosu:
Formal JVM Code Analysis in JavaFAN.
In proceedings of Algebraic Methodology and Software
Technology (AMAST) 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
volume 3116: 132--147.
[PDF]
JavaFAN
is a Java program analysis framework, that can symbolically
execute multithreaded programs, detect safety violations
searching through an unbounded state space, and verify
finite state programs by explicit state model checking.
Both Java language and JVM bytecode analyses are possible.
JavaFAN’s implementation consists of only 3,000 lines of
Maude code, specifying formally the semantics of Java and
JVM in rewriting logic and then using the capabilities of
Maude for efficient execution, search and LTL model
checking of rewriting theories.